There has been no mention of Michigan State wearing a pro-combat jersey this season, but as of 5pm today there is reason to believe that the Spartans almost snuck a fast one by us.
A photo found its way onto Twitter around 5 PM, but most have reacted to it as a fake. I can understand the skepticism and maybe nine times out of ten I would agree with the skepticism, but I have reason to believe this helmet is real. I cannot give out any sources but according to those sources I do have this very well could be a reality for the helmet the Spartans will be wearing on Saturday. I have not been able to 100% confirm there will be a totally different uniform but I can say with certainty something is up for this weekend because these helmets are for real.
What jerseys will be worn with the helmet? I guess we will find out Saturday, but don’t say that I didn’t tell you that the Spartans would be wearing them this weekend.
@SpartanWilliam I didn't get the photo from your site and have an on the record comment on the matter. Also, your sources aren't certain.
I like it when MSU switches it up, but I am a fan of the matte helmets over the chromed out look that Oregon has been using this year.
@diamond83 questions wouldn't arose unless I broke it. But my sources are pretty certain, I don't need to give names.
@B1Gcast both have been played out if you ask me and I personally prefer these to the one's they went with last year. Will be interesting and hearing that the coaching staff and department are pissed that these leaked.
@SpartanWilliam Pretty certain on info doesn't work on our site, and it does on yours, which is fine. I saw the photo before your post.
@diamond83 if you got it from botrc they got it from me. Just didn't see how they got the link in the article. That was my only issue.
@DelanysDozen @SpartanWilliam If it’s just the helmets I’m not a fan. Their helmets are fine as is, everything else is the problem
@BlakeGromek_91 from what we've been told it'll just be helmets, but who knows.. They could be keeping that secret unlike this.